On August 9, 2012, Hillshire Brands (NYSE: HSH) issued initial F2013 (ending June 30) EPS guidance well below the Wall Street consensus estimate. However this is a company in transition, thus near term results likely fail to reflect the true underlying value of the business. As such, considering a longer-term outlook or normalized cash flow, one could reach a fair value of $32 per share.
Management’s F2013 outlook is for flat revenue and EPS of $1.40-$1.55 per share. Operating margin is expected to be slightly down due to increased investment in media, advertising and promotions. HSH also declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.125, or $0.50 annually. Management has set mid-term goals of 4%-5% annual revenue growth, 10% operating margins and a dividend payout of 30%-35% in F2015. As evidenced by management’s F2013 guidance, investments in media, advertising and promotions are still in the early stages and have yet to yield results. Assuming these goals can be achieved, HSH would earn $2.24 per share in F2015 (see attachment). HSH’s peer group, including Hormel Foods Corp. (NYSE: HRL), ConAgra Foods Inc. (NYSE: CAG) and JBS S.A. (SA: JBS), currently trade at roughly 15x forward earnings. Applying that multiple to F2015E EPS would derive a value of $34 per share in three years.
As an alternative, a valuation can be derived based on historic free cash flow generation and the ability to grow the dividend from the current level. In the three years prior to the spin-off, HSH generated an average of $183 million in free cash flow excluding cash provided by and used for D.E Master Blenders (NYSE Euronext: DE), which was separated on June 28, 2012.. If the company were to pay out half of normalized free cash flow to shareholders, a $0.77 per share dividend could be sustained in a normalized scenario. If shares were to yield 2.5%, in line with dividend payers in the S&P 500 index, a fair value estimate of $31 would be derived (see attachment). It could be argued that the 2x coverage may in fact be conservative. Over the past ten years HSH paid 70% of free cash flow out in the form of dividends. Taking an average of the two methods a fair value estimate of $32 is derived.
Finally, it should be noted that HSH may still be considered an attractive takeover candidate. In late 2010 and early 2011 several interested buyers, including both strategic and financial, reportedly made offers for the company. Given the long-term prospects described above, it would seem likely that suitors still exist. If shares were to be acquired at the $32 fair value estimate, it would imply 9.5x F2013E EBITDA (see attachment). This multiple is above the 8.9x average takeout multiple for the food, beverage and tobacco industries over the past ten years as reported by Fitch Ratings.