Menu
Home Our Team Sample Research Client Portal Contact Client Portal Login

UPDATE – Amentum Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: AMTM)

Drop Coverage of AMTM, Effective Immediately

On September 27, 2024, after the market close, Jacobs Solutions Inc. (NYSE: J) completed the spin-off of its Critical Mission Solutions (CMS) & Cyber Intelligence (CI) businesses, which simultaneously merged with privately held Amentum (AMTM) in a Reverse Morris Trust (RMT) transaction.

Considering the time that has elapsed since the transaction (i.e., past our coverage mandate) we DROP coverage of Jacobs Solutions (J), effective immediately.

Simply for context, shares of post-spin AMTM have declined ~33% during our coverage period (underperforming the S&P 500 by ~28% and the Russell 2000 by ~20.5%).

UPDATE – Holcim AG (HOLN SW)

HOLN On-Track to Complete its Separation in June 2025; Maintain Pre-Spin BUY

Holcim AG (HOLN SW), which trades on the SIX Swiss Exchange, is on track to complete the tax-free separation (on a one-for-one basis) of its North American business, which will be dubbed Amrize (and trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker AMRZ with a secondary listing on the SIX Swiss Exchange), from its remaining International business (i.e., Europe, Latin America, North Africa & Australia), which will maintain the current corporate moniker (as well as its listing, domicile & ticker), likely in early-June 2025, subject to, among other things, shareholder approval at the Annual Meeting scheduled for May 14, 2025.

All told, shares of pre-spin HOLN currently trade at ~7.5x 2026E EV/EBITDA and we continue to think the upcoming transaction is likely to unlock value as shares of each company garners appropriate valuations in their respective equity markets. Thus, we maintain our pre-spin BUY recommendation (see Exhibit 5 on page 5). On a post-spin basis, while we still await indications as to where the individual shares will ultimately begin trading in the so-called “when-issued” market, our initial bias leans toward Amrize (SpinCo), which offers higher growth, better margins, and, in our view, will eventually be added to the S&P 500 Index (potentially boosting demand for the shares).

ALERT – ABB Group Ltd. (ABBN SW)

ABB to Spin-Off 100% of its Robotics Division with a Separate Listing Expected in 2Q 2026

On April 17, 2025, ABB Group, which is listed on the SIX Swiss exchange under the ticker ABBN SW, announced that it intended to seek shareholder approval at its 2026 Annual Meeting for a spin-off of 100% of its Robotics division, which, if approved, would precipitate its listing as an independent/pure-play robotics company, in either Sweden or Switzerland, in 2Q 2026.

Currently, ABB operates four segments: 1) Electrification (46.5% of consolidated sales and 55% of segment EBITA in 2024); 2) Motion (23.5% of revenue and 24% of adj. segment EBITA); 3) Process Automation (20.5% of sales and 16% of EBITA); and 4) Robotics & Discrete Automation (9.5% of consolidated 2024 sales and 5% of adj. segment EBITA). Per management, ABB Robotics is the #2 player globally with sales of $2.3 billion in 2024 and suggests it will benefit from being measured more directly against its peers. Further, there are seemingly limited synergies between the ABB Robotics business and the remainder of the ABB divisions, which possess markedly different demand drivers and overall market characteristics. As such, the company contends a separation will support value creation at both units with management describing Robotics has having “proven its double-digit margin resilience and solid cash flow profile over the past few years” within the company’s “decentralized operating model”.  As well, the company indicates the business has the among the industry’s broadest product portfolios and R&D efforts following acquisitions in the Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs), Visual Simultaneous Localization & Mapping (VSLAM) technology sectors in recent years. Following the separation, ABB will ultimately focus on three core “business areas with clear sales and technology synergies” and benefit from more “focused governance and capital allocation”.

In terms of full-year 2025 guidance, within the context of an acknowledged increase in “uncertainty for the global business environment”, ABB broadly expects a positive book-to-bill, comparable revenue growth in the mid-single digit range and year-over-year improvement in operational EBITA. For 2Q 2025 specifically, the company projects comparable sales growth in the mid-single digits with a broadly flat operational EBITA margin around 19%.  

In terms valuation, the Electrification business competes with various players, including Eaton Corp. (NYSE: ETN), Hubbell Inc. (NYSE: HUBB), Legrand SA (LR FP), nVent Electric (NYSE: NVT),  Schneider Electric (SU FP), Siemens AG (SIE GY) and Vertiv Holdings (NYSE: VRT), which trade, on average, at ~14.5x 2025E EV/EBITDA (in a range of 12.5x-17.5x).  Applying a higher-end multiple of 16.5x implies segment value of $61.55 billion.  The Motion business could be compared with Schneider Electric and Siemens, which trade at ~13.5x, implying segment value of ~$21 billion. The Process Automation business competes with publicly traded players, such as Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR), Honeywell International (NYSE: HON), Schneider Electric, and Siemens, which at the peer multiple of ~14x implies segment value of more than ~$15 billion. Lastly, the Robotics division could be imperfectly compared with companies, including Fanuc Corp. (6954 JT), Yaskawa Electric (6506 JT), Rockwell Automation (NYSE: ROK) and Siemens, which trade, on average, at ~14x 2025E EV/EBITDA, implying standalone segment value of nearly $4.8 billion. Accounting for corporate costs, capitalized at the corporate average, as well as projected net debt, including minority interests, implies a preliminary sum of the parts value of $92 billion, which based on a USD/CHF conversion rate of 0.84, yields a per share value of CHF 42 (based on a diluted share count of ~1,840 million).

Sandisk Corp. (SNDK) – UPDATE

Upgrade SNDK to BUY as Stock seems Tolerably Discounted Relative to the Revised Tariff Framework (and the Plausibility of Certain Exemptions for Electronics Products & Components, including Memory Drives)

On February 24, 2025, Sandisk Corp. (NASDAQ: SNDK) completed its separation from Western Digital Corp. (NASDAQ: WDC). In terms of subsequent price action, even accounting for last week’s tariff relief-related rally/volatility, shares of SNDK have declined ~39% (underperforming the S&P 500 and Russell 2000 indexes by ~26.5% and ~22%, respectively) since its initial debut as a standalone company. Within that context and in light of the reduction of reciprocal tariffs, albeit temporary, on its two main geographic suppliers (i.e., Japan & Malaysia) as well as some U.S. Administration guidance issued late-Friday, suggesting that exemptions (for both China and the rest of the world) will at least provisionally exist for certain electronic products & components, including flash and solid-state memory drives, we think at current levels shares present a markedly improved risk/return scenario.  To that end, consider that, by our calculation, the stock seemingly reflects low-to-mid-single digit top-line declines in 2H F2025-F2026 (versus ~17.5% growth in 1H F2025 and management’s medium-term estimation of industry-wide growth in the “mid-to-high teens”), a gross margin of ~29.5% (versus nearly ~39% in 1Q F2025 and management’s thru cycle target of ~35%), an operating margin of ~13.5% (versus nearly 19% in 1Q F2025 and management’s thru cycle target of ~20%) and a ~7.5x multiple (a modest discount to peers Micron & Samsung) on implied 2026E EPS of ~$4.15 (compared with the current consensus estimate, which is undoubtedly stale, of $7.04).  While we acknowledge near-term risks remain, including, among others, the resurgence of trade tensions and/or a breakdown in the seemingly more disciplined/improved supply/demand atmosphere, we would note that SNDK’s long-term earnings & cash flow outlook, which, without any formal timeline for achievement, targets ~$10 billion in sales and an adj. operating margin of ~20% along with free cash flow (FCF) generation of more than ~$1.2 billion (at which time the company would expect to be net cash positive with gross debt of less than $1 billion; see Exhibit 1 on page 2) could, all else being equal, imply longer-term price appreciation potential to ~$79 per share (see Exhibit 2 on page 2).      

In terms of supply chain exposure, as mentioned earlier, SNDK’s biggest vectors are clearly Japan (front-end) and Malaysia (back-end) as well as China albeit to a lesser degree, as supported by recent (but prior to so-called “Liberation Day”) management commentary indicating that, “we produce 100% of our NAND in Japan…so I think our NAND production is in a good place. Everybody — every company has production in different places. Some have NAND production in China. We don’t. And then we take our NAND into different back-end fabs, right? We have a back-end fab in Malaysia, which we showcase it in our analyst days. It’s a great fab. It has great capabilities. And we have a joint venture in China, which is pretty much a twin of the Malaysia fab. So as you can imagine, what we’ve been doing is to make sure that Malaysia can support the U.S., and that, therefore, the tariffs imposed to the cost of the tariffs is minimal to us. So we have a lot of flexibility in doing that. Will there be a cost? Yes, there is still a cost, but it’s not something very meaningful for us as far as we can tell based on available information.”  Seemingly, as of last week, it appears that the reciprocal tariffs of 24% initially levied by the U.S. on the two countries (i.e., Japan & Malaysia) have been reduced to a more manageable 10% (at least for the next 90-days to allow for negotiations to proceed), a factor we have crudely attempted to bake into our revised estimates (which we note are well below current consensus calling for F2026 sales and EPS of $8.65 billion and $7.04, respectively). Anecdotally, amid this somewhat softened stance by the U.S. we would note that trade negotiations with Japan have been fast-tracked/prioritized given its measured/collaborative initial response to tariff implementations and its long history as an important strategic ally, both economically & militarily. Further, as of late-Friday, it appears that updated guidance from the U.S. Customs & Broder Protection Agency includes tariff exemptions for certain electronic devices & products, including, among others, flash drives, memory cards, solid-state drives, semiconductors, solar cells and flat screen televisions, which, if durable, could ultimately imply substantial upside to our current forecasts.  (That said, we would note that over the weekend Administration officials, including trade advisor Peter Navarro and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, attempted to, at least rhetorically, walk back the permanence/impact of these exemptions, so we stay with our base case assumptions with the view that any potential relief as “gravy”.)

On the supply demand front, despite a relatively fragmented competitive backdrop (e.g., as compared with HDD), which includes Samsung Electronics (005930 KS), Kioxia (285A JP), SK Hynix (000660 KS), who acquired Intel’s NAND business for ~$7 billion, and Micron Technology (NASDAQ: MU) as well other state-controlled players, such as Yangtze Memory Technologies, management has staunchly contended that after a “cathartic” downturn in 2019-2023 that saw the industry collectively burn ~$40 billion of aggregate cash flow, the sector, as a whole, is entering new paradigm.  This so-called “New Era of NAND” is expected to reflect a markedly more disciplined approach to capital deployment/capacity expansion (based on both short-term conditions and long-term expectations) across the industry. More specifically, SNDK has predicted that following a “tough…transition” period in 3Q F2025 (as reflected in the guidance illustrated in Exhibit 1 on page 2) operating conditions could markedly improve in 2H C2025. Clearly, this prognostication could not materialize, particularly if demand, driven by depleted excess inventories, a potential refresh cycle in the personal computer (PC) space on the back of the Windows 11 roll-out and the ramp of AI capabilities, falters but we would note that in March 2025 the company announced a ~10% increase on all of its NAND products (effective April 1st) that has seemingly prompted other industry participants, in varying degrees, to follow suit.  As well, while management has not provided any formal guidance on the potential impact of tariffs, they have signaled that additional price increases offer a credible avenue for incremental relief.  So, all told, while we acknowledge that demand trends in the more consumer-oriented Flash space will likely remain decidedly more volatile/cyclical than its HDD peers we discern management is earnest/sincere about its keen focus on reducing the volatility in its gross margin through the course of the cycle (i.e., higher-highs & lower-lows) and it seems like other industry participants, in in the interest of collective betterment, concur.

Recall, in our initial report, which admittedly was before the realized threat of a global trade war, we contended that following the spin-off distribution, we saw a heightened potential risk of initial trading volatility at post-spin Sandisk (SNDK) due to the seemingly dour near-term investor sentiment on the Flash space (and the potential for modest shareholder rotation) but that the dynamic could ultimately present a more compelling entry point for longer-term investors (particularly in front of the potential for a re-rating ahead of a cyclical recovery in 2H C2025, a more disciplined pricing environment and a seemingly solid longer-term secular demand backdrop, particularly in enterprise SSD).  As well, we highlighted that despite near-term conditions there was clearly a significant amount of leverage, in terms of post-spin SNDK’s share price performance, based on the broad range of potential profitability outcomes implied by management’s ~20% adjusted operating margin target (as well as its top-line goal of ~$10 billion), which, we note, could, all else being equal, yield a fair value estimate up to ~$57 per share (and even ~$79 per share at the aspirational revenue target; see Exhibit 2 on page 2). 

For reference, our current fair value estimate of $41 per share (previously $49.50 per share), which implies ~30% of potential upside from current levels, is based on F2026E sales of ~$7.35 billion (compared with current consensus of $8.65 billion) and an 8.0x multiple (roughly in-line with peers MU & Samsung) on F2026E adj. EPS of ~$5.15 (compared with current consensus of $7.04; see Exhibit 3 on page 3). 

UPDATE – Topgolf Callaway Brands (MODG)

MODG enters agreement to sell its Jack Wolfskin apparel brand for $290 million in cash; continues to work toward a separation of Topgolf in 2H 2025

Topgolf Callaway has entered into an agreement to sell its Jack Wolfskin athletic apparel brand to ANTA Sports for $290 million in cash.  The transaction, which, by our calculation values the business at ~21x 2025E adj. EBITDA and 0.8x sales, is expected to close in late-2Q or early 3Q 2025.

Proceeds will likely be used to reduce debt, which  at the end of 2004 stood at ~$2.2 billion, including $445 million in cash (with total liquidity of ~$800 million), and a leverage ratio of 3.9x (compared with 4.1x at the end of 3Q 2024, 3.8x at the end of 2023 and 3.4x at the end of 2022). On a REIT adjusted basis, MODG’s leverage ratio was 1.7x (versus 1.8x at the end of 3Q 2024, 1.9x at the end of 2023 and 2.0x at the end of 2022). 

For context, in January 2019, the company acquired German-based Jack Wolfskin, an outdoor lifestyle brand providing apparel, footwear and equipment (e.g., backpacks, tents, and water bottles) designed for a range of outdoor activities, including camping, hiking, biking and skiing for ~€418 million (~$476 million) or ~1.25x & ~12x 2018 sales and adj. EBITDA.

At the time, the company had articulated a long-term opportunity to grow the brand, which is a leading brand in Europe with a significant presence in China, to ~€475 million in sales and ~€70 million of adj. EBITDA. 

That said, the business had more recently been operating closer to the breakeven level from an EBITDA perspective amid a turnaround under a new management team seeking a more streamlined cost structure and a renewed focus on core markets outside the U.S., including central Europe and Asia.

More specifically, while the company did not formally update guidance, we note that within management’s current full-year 2025 outlook the Jack Wolfskin business was assumed to generate sales of €325 million with €12 million of adj. EBITDA. Given seasonality, the business was projected to generate sales of €115 million with an adj. EBITDA loss of €18 million in 1H 2025 with 2H 2025 sales and adj. EBITDA of €210 million and €30 million, respectively.

In terms of consolidated guidance (see Exhibit #1 on page 2), management’s initial full-year 2025 outlook called for consolidated sales of $4.0-$4.18 billion and adjusted EBITDA of $415-$505 million. Anecdotally, the outlook includes significant headwinds from foreign currency fluctuations (and to a lesser degree tariffs and the timing of product launches) at the Core business while Topgolf is being relatively evenly impacted by both FX and the loss of four operating days in 2025 (given the change from a Gregorian to a Retail calendar). Excluding these “headwinds”, management noted that Core organic sales would be down about ~2% with adj. EBITDA up ~6% while Topgolf sales would be up ~1% with adj. EBITDA down ~7%, at the mid-point (with adj. EBITDAR margins roughly flat).

In terms of cash flow, without providing specific guidance management anecdotally indicated the expectation MODG would be free cash flow positive in 2025 (based on a capital spending budget of $150-$160 million, of which ~$90-$100 million will be directed toward Topgolf) as it was in 2024 and 2023.

Our base case fair value estimate for MODG remains $11.00 per share, reflecting a blended multiple of ~8.5x multiple on our 2026E adjusted EBITDA of ~$523.5 million and net debt of ~$2.2 billion (see Exhibit #2 on page 3).

UPDATE – Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRK)

A new list of MLB valuations by CNBC values the Atlanta Braves at ~$3.1 billion (slightly higher than Forbes’ 2025 valuation of $3 billion); 2-year anniversary of split-off approaching in late-July 2025; our fair value estimate remains to ~$52.50 per share 

This morning, CNBC put out its inaugural (as far as we can tell) compilation of Major League Baseball (MLB) teams that valued the Atlanta Braves at $3.1 billion, ranking it the league’s 8th most valuable franchise.

Recall, back in late-March, Forbes’ released its perennial 2025 appraisals of MLB teams, which valued the Braves at $3 billion, implying a 7% year over year increase (and a ~66.6% rise compared with its 2020 valuation of ~$1.8 billion).  Similarly, the valuation put the team in the 8th spot (up from 11th in 2020) in terms of league-wide comparisons with the New York Yankees remining in the top spot with an estimated price tag of more than $8 billion (see Exhibit #1 on page 2).

In terms of valuation, Forbes’ current appraisal represents a ~5.9x sales multiple (compared with the ~4.7x implied in 2020, the league average of ~6.0x and the most recent team stake sale, which valued the Baltimore Orioles at ~5.2x sales).

Unrelatedly, recall that on July 18, 2023, after the market close, Liberty Media completed the split-off of Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc., which included full ownership of The Atlanta Braves Major League Baseball (MLB) team, its stadium, Truist Park, as well as the adjacent mixed-use development, The Battery Atlanta, into a separate, publicly traded, asset-backed equity (as opposed to its previous multi-class tracking stock structure). 

Our base case fair value estimate remains $52.50 per share, reflecting a ~$52 per share valuation for the Atlanta Braves MLB team, based on a 5.5x multiple of 2025E regular season ballpark sales, a ~$8.50 per share valuation for the company’s real estate/development assets (i.e., The Battery Atlanta), reflecting a 6.5% capitalization rate on our stabilized net operating income estimate, and net debt of ~$8 per share (see Exhibit #2 on page 3).

UPDATE – Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRK)

Forbes’ 2025 valuation for the Atlanta Braves rises ~7% to $3 billion, implying it remained the 8th most valuable MLB franchise; 2-year anniversary of split-off approaching in late-July 2025; our fair value estimate pops to $52.50 per share (from $50 per share)

Forbes’ 2025 appraisals of Major League Baseball (MLB) teams valued the Atlanta Braves at $3 billion, implying a 7% year over year increase (and a ~66.6% rise compared with its 2020 valuation of ~$1.8 billion). 

In terms of the overall rankings, the Braves are purported to be the league’s 8th most valuable franchise (up from 11th in 2020) with the New York Yankees remining in the top spot with an estimated price tag of more than $8 billion (see Exhibit #1 on page 2).

In terms of valuation, the current appraisal represents a ~5.9x sales multiple (compared with the ~4.7x implied in 2020, the league average of ~6.0x and the most recent team stake sale, which valued the Baltimore Orioles at ~5.2x sales).

Unrelatedly, recall that on July 18, 2023, after the market close, Liberty Media completed the split-off of Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc., which included full ownership of The Atlanta Braves Major League Baseball (MLB) team, its stadium, Truist Park, as well as the adjacent mixed-use development, The Battery Atlanta, into a separate, publicly traded, asset-backed equity (as opposed to its previous multi-class tracking stock structure). 

Our base case fair value estimate lifts to $52.50 per share (from $50 per share), reflecting a ~$52 per share valuation for the Atlanta Braves MLB team, based on a 5.5x multiple of 2025E regular season ballpark sales, a ~$8.50 per share valuation for the company’s real estate/development assets (i.e., The Battery Atlanta), reflecting a 6.5% capitalization rate on our stabilized net operating income estimate, and net debt of ~$8 per share (see Exhibit #2 on page 3).

PCS Research Services welcomes and encourages your feedback.  Please feel free to call us if we can be of service.

UPDATE – IDT Corporation (NYSE: IDT)

Close coverage of IDT Corp. (IDT) with shares trading roughly in-line with our fair value estimate and low visibility into potential catalysts

For context, shares appreciated ~9% (compared with a 23% increase in the S&P 500 and a ~10% decline in the Russell 2000) since our initial recommendation in October 2021.

While we continue to view IDT’s growth businesses, cash flow generation and net cash position positively, with the potential transactional catalysts (i.e., the potential separations of NRS and/or net2phone) seemingly on the back burner for the time being, we prefer to maintain a disciplined approach and close coverage/withdraw our recommendation, as of today’s close.

That said, we will continue to monitor shares for an opportunity to re-recommend if valuation shifts or incremental steps toward potential strategic alternatives materialize.

PCS Research Group welcomes and encourages your feedback. Please feel free to call us if we can be of service.

UPDATE – Tiptree Inc. (TIPT)

Close coverage of Tiptree (TIPT) with shares trading roughly in-line with our fair value estimate and low visibility into potential catalysts

For context, TIPT shares have increased ~62.5% (outperforming the S&P 500 and Russell 2000 indexes by ~35.5% and 55%, respectively) since our initial recommendation in July 2023.

That said, with the shares trading roughly in-line with our fair value estimate (and another attempt at an initial public offering for the insurance business seemingly unlikely in the immediate future) we prefer to maintain a disciplined approach and close coverage/withdraw our recommendation, as of today’s close.

As always, we will continue to monitor shares for an opportunity to re-recommend if valuation shifts or incremental catalysts (e.g., an IPO for Fortegra) re-emerge.

PCS Research Group welcomes and encourages your feedback.  Please feel free to call us if we can be of service.

UPDATE – IAC Inc. (IAC)

Increased share repurchase authorization, disclosed in an 8-K filing this morning, suggests IAC significantly ramped up buyback activity in 1Q 2025 to ~4% of the outstanding share count

This morning, in an 8-K filing, IAC disclosed its Board had authorized a 10 million share increase to the company’s repurchase authorization, which, as of today, currently stands at 10.2 million shares.

For context, recall that at the end of 2024 (i.e., December 31st) IAC had ~3.68 million remaining on its repurchase authorization, implying that so far in 1Q 2025 the company has repurchased roughly 3.5 million shares or ~4% of the outstanding share count at prices that could have potentially ranged between ~$42.50-$48.00 per share, suggesting a total capital return of ~$150-$165 million. (At the end of 2024, IAC had net debt of ~$169 million, including ~$1.8 billion of cash and $1.967 billion of debt.)

In terms of guidance, recall back in February 2025, in conjunction with 4Q 2024 results the company issued consolidated full-year 2025 adj. EBITDA guidance of $345-$425 million (compared with ~$380 million in 2024 and $336.5 million in 2023).

Additionally, the company still intends to complete the previously announced “spin-off” of its ~85% stake in Angi (NASDAQ: ANGI) by the end of 1H 2025 albeit no sooner than March 31st (i.e., 2Q 2025), which will mark the 10th launch of an fully independent company (e.g., Ticketmaster, ILG, Lending Tree, HSN, Expedia, TripAdvisor, Trivago, Match Group, & Bluecrew).

PCS Research Services welcomes and encourages your feedback.  Please feel free to call us if we can be of service.